<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Source Control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nicocrm.com/2006/11/22/source-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nicocrm.com/2006/11/22/source-control/</link>
	<description>Programming, technology, and CRM - from a Belgian programmer exiled to Missouri</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:53:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: katieg</title>
		<link>http://blog.nicocrm.com/2006/11/22/source-control/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>katieg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.chivinou.net/?p=46#comment-278</guid>
		<description>I use to love subversion, but then a year ago my company switched everything over to AccuRev, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.accurev.com/accurev-source-code-control.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;source control tool &lt;/a&gt;that&#039;s known for managing the development process. I&#039;m sure it wasn&#039;t cheap, but it works a lot better for our large development team. The only problem was that were weren&#039;t able to transfer our history in SVN to AccuRev, but our performance and release quality has really improved, and AccuRev requires a lot less administration than than and Subversion did. But I still use subversion for my own small projects at home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use to love subversion, but then a year ago my company switched everything over to AccuRev, a <a href="http://www.accurev.com/accurev-source-code-control.html" rel="nofollow">source control tool </a>that&#8217;s known for managing the development process. I&#8217;m sure it wasn&#8217;t cheap, but it works a lot better for our large development team. The only problem was that were weren&#8217;t able to transfer our history in SVN to AccuRev, but our performance and release quality has really improved, and AccuRev requires a lot less administration than than and Subversion did. But I still use subversion for my own small projects at home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chivinou</title>
		<link>http://blog.nicocrm.com/2006/11/22/source-control/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>chivinou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.chivinou.net/?p=46#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Well I still haven&#039;t tried VisualSVN. I did give a try to Ankh, and it was almost nice, but in my opinion it tries to do too much. All I really want is an indication of whether my files are committed or not, and a way to add them through the UI - I don&#039;t want them to be renamed automatically, or added automatically, or in fact anything automatic. Ankh actually managed to mark a couple entire folders for deletion - needless to say I wasn&#039;t too happy with that.  But I did find out that it works pretty well when you disable the automatically adding of files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I still haven&#8217;t tried VisualSVN. I did give a try to Ankh, and it was almost nice, but in my opinion it tries to do too much. All I really want is an indication of whether my files are committed or not, and a way to add them through the UI &#8211; I don&#8217;t want them to be renamed automatically, or added automatically, or in fact anything automatic. Ankh actually managed to mark a couple entire folders for deletion &#8211; needless to say I wasn&#8217;t too happy with that.  But I did find out that it works pretty well when you disable the automatically adding of files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheremetyev</title>
		<link>http://blog.nicocrm.com/2006/11/22/source-control/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>sheremetyev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.chivinou.net/?p=46#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I think you will find &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.visualsvn.com/&quot;&gt;VisualSVN&lt;/a&gt; interesting. It provides Subversion integration for Visual Studio and uses TortoiseSVN for most of the UI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you will find <a href="http://www.visualsvn.com/">VisualSVN</a> interesting. It provides Subversion integration for Visual Studio and uses TortoiseSVN for most of the UI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

